Re: How impressive is 115-140 fps?
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 12:36
Why do you want more fps?
It brings all the girls to the yardJoris wrote:Why do you want more fps?
Page 2 of 2
Re: How impressive is 115-140 fps?
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 14:29
Re: How impressive is 115-140 fps?
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 15:55
They came marching indinga wrote:It brings all the girls to the yardJoris wrote:Why do you want more fps?
Re: How impressive is 115-140 fps?
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 16:02
joshuatanuseputra wrote:They came marching indinga wrote:It brings all the girls to the yardJoris wrote:Why do you want more fps?
Re: How impressive is 115-140 fps?
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2017 22:59
I must be doing something wrong, mine does not display over 60 fpsjoshuatanuseputra wrote:Hi guys,
I have been going HAM on a new hardware dedicated for resolume.
Here below are my hardware spec:
1x ASUS Z10PE-d8 WS Mobo
1x Intel Xeon E5-2640v4, 2.4Ghz, Cache 25MB, LGA2011-v3
4x Team DDR4 ECC Reg Server Ram 16GB 2133Mhz (Running 64gb)
1x MSI GTX 1080 Armor 8GB DDR5x 256 bit
and LOADS OF FANS to keep the heat far farrrrrr away!
I wanted to ask, how impressive is running 115 to 140 FPS range consistently with playing and previewing 1920x1080@30p with a DXV 3 codec through the Resolume ui? (it means I am not out putting into any external monitors)
How can I achieve better FPS? Maybe a better GPU with higher VRam and memory bandwidth?
Thanks
Note: I am also running Resolume and its clip(s) on a Samsung SSD 850 PRO 2.5" SATA III 1TB
Re: How impressive is 115-140 fps?
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2017 23:46
This very likely has to do with your Vsync settings in the GPU control panel.
Re: How impressive is 115-140 fps?
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2017 09:28
At 100+ fps nothing more matters. Not even strobeing will improve. Like these guys said your playback content wont even be that fps. All that's important is to make sure it stays over 60 at whatever resolution your trying to do. It's not about e-sports and CS:go.
If you column bomb 6-7+ HD clips running 4k resolutions and don't want nuke your fps yes nVME m.2's help because that's the real test. Long duration transition effects times are also hard work with that many clips being accessed at once.
If you column bomb 6-7+ HD clips running 4k resolutions and don't want nuke your fps yes nVME m.2's help because that's the real test. Long duration transition effects times are also hard work with that many clips being accessed at once.
Re: How impressive is 115-140 fps?
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2017 09:36
If your composition doesn't render higher than 60 fps, it means your monitor is refreshing at 60Hz. This in turn means it cannot display more than 60 frames per second. When rendering at framerates over 60 the excess frames will be simply thrown away.
You're literally making your computer work for nothing.
You're literally making your computer work for nothing.
Re: How impressive is 115-140 fps?
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2017 11:15
We like being the North Korean prison wardens of resolume fps. That's gotta be the answer.Joris wrote:If your composition doesn't render higher than 60 fps, it means your monitor is refreshing at 60Hz. This in turn means it cannot display more than 60 frames per second. When rendering at framerates over 60 the excess frames will be simply thrown away.
You're literally making your computer work for nothing.
Re: How impressive is 115-140 fps?
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2017 20:41
Joris wrote:If your composition doesn't render higher than 60 fps, it means your monitor is refreshing at 60Hz. This in turn means it cannot display more than 60 frames per second. When rendering at framerates over 60 the excess frames will be simply thrown away.
You're literally making your computer work for nothing.
Makes sense, thanks for clearing that up!