Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 01:45
by Iejun
indeed .. so far what I know..
Ati - games
nvidia = video
getting that geforce 7800 GTX in a couple of weeks
...
Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 11:13
by therandelman
Originally posted by Iejun
Ati - games
nVidia = video
are you serious? isn't it the other way round?
besides that propably the best cards for working with video might be matrox cards...?
Originally posted by juba
i prefere the drivers with good and clear settings over the "bubblegum" style ati settings...
what do you mean by "bubblegumsettings"?
if you have tried out both types of cards/drivers, maybe you could point out the pros and cons of each... ?
thx.trm.
Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 11:54
by bart
with the alternative omega drivers for the ATI cards you can set the resolution to native PAL or NTSC ... does anyone know if that is also possible with nvidea? (we only have ati and matrox videocards here at the Resolume HQ so i can,t check)
Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 19:10
by kojovici
Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 23:13
by DAS BEN
you can change the output to 720*576 or 720*480. but there is no choise for the framerate. you can choose between 60 and 50 hertz, that might be simular to 25 or 30 frames a second.
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 09:58
by bart
how does this contribute to the discussion?
reviving...
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 12:29
by therandelman
has this weird last taurunumboys-post really killed the thread?
i would have loved to read more/ compare Nvidea and ATI drivers... not only because i will soon have to make a decission between those brands...!!
so if anyone has any more input about the original topic - forget about those taurumboys and keep on posting!
thx.trm.