mixer plugins in R2.3 final
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 03:25
i spent some time on playing with R2.3 final and i noticed two important differences between final version and R2.3 RC2:
- first one is good thing: finally, extreme slider values are passed to plugin rather than switching to raw input A or B
- but second one... order of passing inputs A/B to freeframe mixers was changed without any notice, so now my smooth luma keys (and few other mixers) are unuseable in R2.3. only Intrinsic mixers (Isc*) included in R2.3 package works as expected (for those curious - try those plugs in R2.2 to see what i talk about). ofcourse workaround is pretty simple, but it can be only achieved through recompiling plugs with new default variable for "swap sources" param or changing default value in resolume/settings/fx.xml. none of those methods satisfy me
i saw some discussion regarding freeframe 2-input mixers on freeframe-develop list, so i assume that your decisions are connected to latest posts on this list...
what you can suggest to fix this issue? to be honest: i dont like idea of preparing 2 versions of vvSmoothLK - for R2.3 and for older R versions..
- first one is good thing: finally, extreme slider values are passed to plugin rather than switching to raw input A or B
- but second one... order of passing inputs A/B to freeframe mixers was changed without any notice, so now my smooth luma keys (and few other mixers) are unuseable in R2.3. only Intrinsic mixers (Isc*) included in R2.3 package works as expected (for those curious - try those plugs in R2.2 to see what i talk about). ofcourse workaround is pretty simple, but it can be only achieved through recompiling plugs with new default variable for "swap sources" param or changing default value in resolume/settings/fx.xml. none of those methods satisfy me

i saw some discussion regarding freeframe 2-input mixers on freeframe-develop list, so i assume that your decisions are connected to latest posts on this list...
what you can suggest to fix this issue? to be honest: i dont like idea of preparing 2 versions of vvSmoothLK - for R2.3 and for older R versions..