Hi, i have a gig coming up and they asked me if i could project on a round screen. I said i could do this cause their should not be any problem. My strategy would be just to make a mask that only shows a circle and then aim the beam and the circular screen.
Are there any issues i'm overlooking ...
Search found 16 matches
- Tue May 20, 2014 19:06
- Forum: Problems? Bugs? Solutions!
- Topic: Projecting on a round screen
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7670
- Mon Jan 20, 2014 20:50
- Forum: Developers Developers Developers
- Topic: Processing and Resolume running a side eachother
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5180
Processing and Resolume running a side eachother
Hi, first off, yes i know there are a lot of topics on this and i know you can use Syphon on Mac (is it out on Windows yet?) but i have an other question :)
So, if you run a processing frame and over that a Resolume frame, is it possible to make the resolume frame transparant and show the ...
So, if you run a processing frame and over that a Resolume frame, is it possible to make the resolume frame transparant and show the ...
- Mon Jun 03, 2013 19:09
- Forum: Problems? Bugs? Solutions!
- Topic: Processing to dxtory to resolume?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5494
Processing to dxtory to resolume?
Hi!
I just discovered dxtory. Is it possible to use this to route Processing to Resolume? It's very easy to make Processing as input, but I can't find a choise to use another program as output, just to save it to drive.
So is it possible to do something like this? I know about Syphon and stuff ...
I just discovered dxtory. Is it possible to use this to route Processing to Resolume? It's very easy to make Processing as input, but I can't find a choise to use another program as output, just to save it to drive.
So is it possible to do something like this? I know about Syphon and stuff ...
- Mon Mar 19, 2012 14:37
- Forum: Developers Developers Developers
- Topic: Processing and Resolume?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7027
Re: Processing and Resolume?
Found it on the New Feature forum, such a pity that Processing doesn't want to release an API
- Mon Mar 19, 2012 14:09
- Forum: Developers Developers Developers
- Topic: Processing and Resolume?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7027
Processing and Resolume?
Had a little break from the previous version, and looked around on this new forum. But couldn't seem to find if there is Processing support yet?
Maybe someone wrote a plug-in or something?
Maybe someone wrote a plug-in or something?
- Wed Aug 03, 2011 19:27
- Forum: Hardware
- Topic: External Sound Card
- Replies: 0
- Views: 3123
External Sound Card
Hi,
Had my eye on the Tascam us-122, reasonably priced and has all I need.
Somebody has any experience with this one? Or would you recommend an other one in that price range?
Its for a digital signal for the FFT analyser
Had my eye on the Tascam us-122, reasonably priced and has all I need.
Somebody has any experience with this one? Or would you recommend an other one in that price range?
Its for a digital signal for the FFT analyser
- Mon Aug 01, 2011 19:12
- Forum: Problems? Bugs? Solutions!
- Topic: Link audio FFT to timeline
- Replies: 41
- Views: 70407
Re: Link audio FFT to timeline
Still not working
tried all the letters

tried all the letters
- Mon Aug 01, 2011 18:40
- Forum: Problems? Bugs? Solutions!
- Topic: Link audio FFT to timeline
- Replies: 41
- Views: 70407
Re: Link audio FFT to timeline
Nope, thanks for thinking with me but as I said, it's like the effect isnt working somehow ?
- Mon Aug 01, 2011 18:34
- Forum: Problems? Bugs? Solutions!
- Topic: Link audio FFT to timeline
- Replies: 41
- Views: 70407
Re: Link audio FFT to timeline
Well the clip is playing constantly with no change what so ever, it seems that the OSC effect doesnt have any effect on the clip somehow.
EDIT: if I unassign the effect the program crashes
EDIT: if I unassign the effect the program crashes

- Mon Aug 01, 2011 18:14
- Forum: Problems? Bugs? Solutions!
- Topic: Link audio FFT to timeline
- Replies: 41
- Views: 70407
Re: Link audio FFT to timeline
Yep, I really cant see what I'm doing wrong