resolume version 2.0 for mac??

t3rrorbit_ · Post by **t3rrorbit_** » Wed Jun 23, 2004 12:14

hello
i have now enough from my pentium 4 2,6 ghz 1 GB computer with windows, cause, rendering a video with a length of about 3 minutes takes up to 1 hour, so i decided to buy a mac, the only thing is that resolume wouldnt run anymore is the version 2.0 planed to be on mac?

or should i use flowmotion instead

Post by **bart** » Thu Jun 24, 2004 09:47

resolume 2.0 will not run on a mac ...
but rendering your video will still take long .. in fact i have never met anyone who bought a mac because it is faster, (its not) only because it is pretty (it is)

ooh don,t let this tread turn in a mac vs pc war!

miguel_ · Post by **miguel_** » Thu Jun 24, 2004 21:36

Dear bart, if you don't want this tread turn in a mac vs pc war, don't say stupid things.

rapunzel_ · Post by **rapunzel_** » Thu Jun 24, 2004 22:33

hmm,don`t understand.......on my PIII 800mhz
rendering video with a length of about 3 minutes takes
up to 11 minutes!

sorry for my bad english.....

Post by **bart** » Fri Jun 25, 2004 08:56

miguel> if you think i say something stupid please prove me wrong!

intosite_ · Post by **intosite_** » Fri Jun 25, 2004 09:29

Well i guess it depends on what you render....

I have 2 macs, a power mac g4 and powerbook.. They are bout 3 years old. And doing stuff on them is slowly coming to a halt.

Right now am using a p4 2.8. Kinda switch over cause you can get a pc for about half the price for a similarly speed mac.

For me, i dont consider getting a mac or pc over their speed. But rather for their colors.

As i do design, the mac is better for print design as the color is match better to the commercial printer i use. But for web, i use a pc as most of the target audience out there uses a pc.

Bit of side line, i don't really like os x interface. Too much eye candy and uses too much cpu resources. I still stick to os 9 but software is slowly getting out dated.
cheers

mike feild_ · Post by **mike feild_** » Sun Jun 27, 2004 16:46

come on bart...
everybody know's mac's are better than pc's because everybody says so,you know think different and all that shit,you know "supercomputers" and all that lot
i did a gig last week with my friends "supercomputer"
powerbook 1.25, 1 gig of ram, lacie fw, s-video running into a canopus,firewired into resolume
and it shut down after about 30 minutes from heat
but hey it looks good..
and by the way i have a g4 desktop and a pc tower i drag around for resolume.
it not a pc vs mac thing
its called marketting

porni_ · Post by **porni_** » Sun Jun 27, 2004 21:22

mac is good for publishing not for videojockeys

metaprofessor_ · Post by **metaprofessor_** » Mon Jun 28, 2004 10:58

if a three minute video is taking one hour to render on a P4, 2.6 Ghz, you have serious problems with your computer. i have the same processor and it takes no more than 10 minutes to render clips for resolume.

kio_ · Post by **kio_** » Mon Jun 28, 2004 17:15

bah.. quite strange... how can you say how a 3 min video take to render if you don't know of what kind of video are we talking: the software, compositing, 3d render, particle effects, grain, there are a lot of variebles..
(mac are good only for publishing just because service still use only them)
bye