resolution and compression

Just let it all out, buddy. You're among friends here.
Post Reply
User avatar
vjcharm
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 21:09

resolution and compression

Post by vjcharm »

Okay, so I've been doing a lot of hacking around with video clips trying to get them to play as smoothly as possible, with different codecs and resolutions, and here is what I have found (keep in mind I am new to video processing).

Resolume suggests converting everything to 320 x 240, when I tried doing this in PRemiere Pro, it made everything look like crap, and all boxy looking and pixelly. Also, the codec I found to work the best is something called cinepak, all the rest made it very choppy playback. Anyway, I guess I don't understand resolution or something, because I downloaded some stuff from starloops.net that was 320x240 and it looked fine, yet my clips looked like shite? btw, this is after recompressing the same clips about 5 or 6 times.

nwonknu
Posts: 93
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 17:20

Re: resolution and compression

Post by nwonknu »

Avoid cinepak. Indeo 5.1 is better, or m-jpeg.
320x240 is to low for nowdays. Use 640x480 or 720x576.
And you're right, resoulme likes only one resolution.

User avatar
bart
Team Resolume
Posts: 2236
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 10:01
Location: Resolume HQ

Re: resolution and compression

Post by bart »

When you're rendering clips to use in resolume it's better not to use square pixels 720x576 because this is not 4:3 which your tv-out is. Use 768x576 square pixels because that is 4:3.

And when you,re using Indeo 5.1 set the quality to 100% and you,ll have good image quality and smooth playback.

nwonknu
Posts: 93
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 17:20

Re: resolution and compression

Post by nwonknu »

Yes my mistake, its 768 :?

Post Reply