Big big screens, 400*300 enough?

Just let it all out, buddy. You're among friends here.
Post Reply
TommyJ_

Post by TommyJ_ »

Hi all,

Important question: is using footage with a resolution of 400*300 enough for beaming on big screens (4x3m, 6x4m)??

Cya,
Tommy J

Dave_

Post by Dave_ »

I use 320x240 output and get excellent results a 8m H by 5m width ... I do use vector files tho :)

turnt_

Post by turnt_ »

640x480 would be perfect - but with 2 layers my Laptop slows down.

320x240 is perfect for mixing
with 400x300 I dont see much difference from 320x240

i use:
Indeo 5.11
25frames per sec.
400x300

nz_

Post by nz_ »

If you source material is high quality is doesn't really matter. we beamed on 190 square metres during a big event, so 400x300 is just fine, although we would like to go pal someday ;)

noce_

Post by noce_ »

it's not about projection screen dimension. it's about the dimensions of the space and the distance with audience.
resolution high or low doesn't change if u use a tv monitor or a huge screen: if u are near the screen u'll see the pixels, otherwise not, in both cases.
still using 640x480 makes mixing more difficult (it's up to your hardware too) ...

Jelle Swetter_

Post by Jelle Swetter_ »

Tommy said that using 400*300 gives no problems as he is using vector files
but,
does it make a difference using vectors or using pre-rendered, properly anti-aliased movies
as I think it would make no diference, I'd really like to see this program go to the point where it could handle full-size pal (or ntcs) movies (768*576)

my 2cts
Jelle

metaprofessor_

Post by metaprofessor_ »

i use 512x384 and it looks pretty good. i'm not satisfied with anything less quality-wise. 640x480 is too much and my computer can't handle it.

SuperficiaL_

Post by SuperficiaL_ »

hi Jelle,

resolume can handle fullsize pal.... its your computer that cant cope with the data stream through your processor...
if u like high res stuff buy a couple of portable dvd players... works great!

greetz,
SuperficiaL...

Post Reply