performance sucks

Otto Sander_ · Post by **Otto Sander_** » Thu Sep 09, 2004 15:41

in the fullscreen modos 1.51 and 2.0
its no fluend nice toy but to make a real performance its embarrassing

dork_ · Post by **dork_** » Thu Sep 09, 2004 15:43

not half as embarrassing as your english!

Otto Sander_ · Post by **Otto Sander_** » Thu Sep 09, 2004 15:48

learn french and german and we will see your langSkills fool

Post by **bart** » Thu Sep 09, 2004 18:07

No need to get rude here boyz!

I,m sure we can find out why Otto gets such poor performance by explaining to us what his computer specs are, what codecs he used etc.

Otto Sander_ · Post by **Otto Sander_** » Thu Sep 09, 2004 19:48

my laptop specs are 2 GHZ 512 mb ram geforce cinepac codec !!!

john b_ · Post by **john b_** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 13:23

damm
somebody says something thats not a praise
about resolume and you attack him
you sound like one of those mac heads that have a shit fit when somebody says something bad about
mac's,grow up
i love resolume,but am still useing 1.5.1 because 2.0
"isnt there yet" performance wise IMHO
why not chill dork
peace

vjBrye_ · Post by **vjBrye_** » Sat Sep 11, 2004 06:14

I get pretty good performance out of both versions personally. I'm sure that your just missing something here. Whats your clip resolution? are you using an external hard drive (lappy drives are slow)? what are your display settings set at? really, theres more to it than just having a decent machine, you gotta set it up right to work with some of the quirks.

Theres no need to get nasty people...

Trunx_ · Post by **Trunx_** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 16:18

To be quite honest, i believe that resolume 2.0's performance is damn good. I use a 2.6 Ghz Red Submarine with 512Mb RAM, a Happauge WinTV card and ATI 9600 Vivo box for 2 video camera inputs (btw, thanks to ed and bart for sorting out the driver issues for 2.0, the vivo works pretty well apart from fullscreen on output 2) and i've found the whole system to be extremely reliable and super high quality. I reckon bart and ed should ignore any infedels that tell them otherwise, there's plenty of us out here who are far more reliable for feedback. There's no accounting for ignorance is there!

Dan_ · Post by **Dan_** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 17:58

If you are getting _really_ slow video performance when playing video in an undocked window then you likely haven't got things set up right.

Does video play okay when in the preview screen but slowly when moved to a second monitor?

Have you got the display that teh video will play on configured in windows as the primary monitor and the one with the resolume interface on as the secondary?

Have you made sure that the video window is only shown on one monitor (on many gfx cards, spanning a video window across more than one monitor seriously impacts performance)

What resolution are you running the fullscreen mode at - you will get better performance if you run at 320x240 or 640x480 and then stretch to fit the screen.

I can assure you that resolume is fine for performances _when configured correctly_.

Ignore people who are rude to you - most resolume users are nice people who will be happy to help you get it working right.

Dan.

Post by **bart** » Tue Sep 14, 2004 12:52

did you get it working ok with these tips otto? if not then please reply again here so we can help you out some more ...

thanx for all the love and support guys