Converter for FreeFrame-Plugins from Resolume 2 to Resolume3

Post your questions here and we'll all try to help.
Post Reply
cybertango
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:05

Converter for FreeFrame-Plugins from Resolume 2 to Resolume3

Post by cybertango »

Is there any Converter for FreeFrame-Plugins from Resolume2 (FreeFrame 1.0) to Resolume3 on Mac OS X?

User avatar
VJzoo
Posts: 263
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:41
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: Converter for FreeFrame-Plugins from Resolume 2 to Resolume3

Post by VJzoo »

I think we have to wait for them to be rewritten :(

its very frustrating.
Jas
(the dyslexic VJzoo)

http://vjzoo.com
~ quite nice visuals ~

vjsmad
Posts: 32
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 21:58

Re: Converter for FreeFrame-Plugins from Resolume 2 to Resolume3

Post by vjsmad »

why didnt you implement compatibility for freeframe 1.0 and freeframe 1.5? i know that thomas from intrinsic has develop his own vj sofware with that feature so its possible!! and everyone would be very verry happy!!

User avatar
VJair
Posts: 609
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 21:23
Location: Kent - UK

Re: Converter for FreeFrame-Plugins from Resolume 2 to Resolume3

Post by VJair »

freeframe 1 / 1.5 are realy slow and processor intensive, whereas freeframeGL is MUCH faster and better quality. if you offer support for an older, slower form of plugin, then peop;le will continue to make them.... if they have to make better, faster plugins, then people will have to make those..... i know which id rather have ;)

User avatar
VJzoo
Posts: 263
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:41
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: Converter for FreeFrame-Plugins from Resolume 2 to Resolume3

Post by VJzoo »

VJair wrote:freeframe 1 / 1.5 are realy slow and processor intensive, whereas freeframeGL is MUCH faster and better quality. if you offer support for an older, slower form of plugin, then peop;le will continue to make them.... if they have to make better, faster plugins, then people will have to make those..... i know which id rather have ;)
that may be the case but if you have paid for quite a few plugins its a bit annoying.
Jas
(the dyslexic VJzoo)

http://vjzoo.com
~ quite nice visuals ~

User avatar
VJair
Posts: 609
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 21:23
Location: Kent - UK

Re: Converter for FreeFrame-Plugins from Resolume 2 to Resolume3

Post by VJair »

VJzoo wrote:
VJair wrote:freeframe 1 / 1.5 are realy slow and processor intensive, whereas freeframeGL is MUCH faster and better quality. if you offer support for an older, slower form of plugin, then peop;le will continue to make them.... if they have to make better, faster plugins, then people will have to make those..... i know which id rather have ;)
that may be the case but if you have paid for quite a few plugins its a bit annoying.
i own pretty much all of the commercialy available freeframe plugins. but once you have a good play around with the FFGL plugins, you can see how poorly a lot of the original ones perform. ive been lucky enough too see some of the ones being developed too, and they realy do blow the original ones out of the water imo. the original FF standard dates back some 7 years or so, i believe its time we moved forwards and put those cpu cycles to greater use.

User avatar
VJzoo
Posts: 263
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:41
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: Converter for FreeFrame-Plugins from Resolume 2 to Resolume3

Post by VJzoo »

I agree the standard needed to be updated and Avenue needed to go for FFGL only support but doing this and no longer bug fixing Resolume 2.x when there are still problems is the frustrating thing.
Jas
(the dyslexic VJzoo)

http://vjzoo.com
~ quite nice visuals ~

Post Reply